Rather than bad engineering of the eye, let me refer to bad engineering of
the respiratory and ailimentary systems. Who in their right mind, would
design a pipeline system where gaseous and semi-liquid have to cross but
not mix? Our designer worked around this one with a complicated valving
system that doesn’t always work properly. Sometimes failure of this
separation device lead to catastrophic failure of the entire organism.
Come to think of it, I have seen some designs by engineers that are at
least that silly.
William Buchman
billyf…@aol.com (BillyFish) wrote:
>Rather than bad engineering of the eye, let me refer to bad engineering of
>the respiratory and ailimentary systems. Who in their right mind, would
>design a pipeline system where gaseous and semi-liquid have to cross but
>not mix? Our designer worked around this one with a complicated valving
>system that doesn’t always work properly. Sometimes failure of this
>separation device lead to catastrophic failure of the entire organism.
>Come to think of it, I have seen some designs by engineers that are at
>least that silly.
You remind me of a joke I heard awhile back:
Not being much of a joke teller, I’ll ruin it by just stating that the
gist was that our Maker must’ve been a civil engineer, because, in
reference to the lower end of that alimentary (I do think your
"*ail*imentary" says something for itself also) canal, who else
would’ve run a sewer line through a recreation area?
Ray (not one of *that* kind of engineer)